Suprachoroidal Space Injection Technique: Expert Panel Guidance.

PURPOSE: To develop professional guidelines for best practices for suprachoroidal space (SCS) injection, an innovative technique for retinal therapeutic delivery, based on current published evidence and clinical experience. METHODS: A panel of expert ophthalmologists reviewed current published evidence and clinical experience during a live working group meeting to define points of consensus and key clinical considerations to inform the development of guidelines for in-office SCS injection. RESULTS: Core consensus guidelines for in-office SCS injection were reached and reported by the expert panel. Current clinical evidence and physician experience supported SCS injection as a safe and effective method for delivering retinal and choroidal therapeutics. The panel established consensus on the rationale for SCS injection, including potential benefits relative to other intraocular delivery methods, and current best practices in patient preparation, pre- and peri-injection management, SCS-specific injection techniques, and post-injection management and follow-up. CONCLUSION: These expert panel guidelines may support and promote standardization of SCS injection technique, with the goal of optimizing patient safety and outcomes. Some aspects of the procedure may reasonably be modified based on clinical setting and physician judgement, as well as areas requiring additional study.

Safety and Efficacy of CLS-TA by Anatomic Location of Inflammation: Results from the Phase 3 PEACHTREE Clinical Trial.

PURPOSE: To explore the efficacy of CLS-TA, a proprietary suprachoroidal injectable suspension of triamcinolone acetonide, in noninfectious uveitis (NIU) with macular edema (ME), categorized by anatomic subtype. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with ME associated with NIU of any etiology and anatomic subtype were eligible for the phase 3 PEACHTREE trial of CLS-TA. Post-hoc analyses were performed, stratified by discrete anatomic subtype of uveitis (anterior, intermediate, posterior, and panuveitis.). RESULTS: Across all anatomic subtypes at 24 weeks, patients receiving CLS-TA at baseline and week 12 demonstrated mean increases in BCVA ranging from +12.1 to +15.9 letters, mean central subfield thickness (CST) improvement ranging from -120.1 µm to -189.0 µm, and IOP changes ranging from +0.5 to +3.1 mmHg. Overall, reports of adverse events were similar among subtypes. CONCLUSIONS: Irrespective of the uveitic anatomic subtype among patients treated for ME associated with NIU, a clinical benefit in participants treated with CLS-TA was demonstrated, with a comparable safety profile.

The complement system: a novel therapeutic target for age-related macular degeneration.

INTRODUCTION: With the recent FDA approvals of pegcetacoplan (SYFOVRE, Apellis Pharmaceuticals) and avacincaptad pegol (IZERVAY, Astellas Pharmaceuticals), modulation of the complement system has emerged as a promising therapeutic approach for slowing progression of geographic atrophy (GA) in AMD. AREAS COVERED: This article reviews the current understanding of the complement system, its role in AMD, and the various complement-targeting therapies in development for the treatment of GA, including monoclonal antibodies, aptamers, protein analogs, and gene therapies. Approved and investigational agents have largely focused on interfering with the activity of complement components 3 and 5, owing to their central roles in the classical, lectin, and alternative complement pathways. Other investigational therapies have targeted formation of membrane attack complex (a terminal step in the complement cascade which leads to cell lysis), complement factors H and I (which serve regulatory functions in the alternative pathway), complement factors B and D (within the alternative pathway), and complement component 1 (within the classical pathway). Clinical trials investigating these agents are summarized, and the potential benefits and limitations of these therapies are discussed. EXPERT OPINION: Targeting the complement system is a promising therapeutic approach for slowing the progression of GA in AMD, potentially improving visual outcomes. However, increased risk of exudative conversion must be considered, and further research is required to identify clinical criteria and best practices for initiating complement inhibitor therapy for GA.

The evolving therapeutic landscape of diabetic retinopathy.

INTRODUCTION: Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a leading cause of blindness worldwide. Recent decades have seen rapid progress in the management of diabetic eye disease, evolving from pituitary ablation to photocoagulation and intravitreal pharmacotherapy. The advent of effective intravitreal drugs inhibiting vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) marked a new era in DR therapy. Sustained innovation has since produced several promising biologics targeting angiogenesis, inflammation, oxidative stress, and neurodegeneration. AREAS COVERED: This review surveys traditional, contemporary, and emerging therapeutics for DR, with an emphasis on anti-VEGF therapies, receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors, angiopoietin-Tie2 pathway inhibitors, integrin pathway inhibitors, gene therapy 'biofactory' approaches, and novel systemic therapies. Some of these investigational therapies are being delivered intravitreally via sustained release technologies for extended durability. Other investigational agents are being delivered non-invasively via topical and systemic routes. These strategies hold promise for early and long-lasting treatment of DR. EXPERT OPINION: The evolving therapeutic landscape of DR is rapidly expanding our toolkit for the effective and durable treatment of blinding eye disease. However, further research is required to validate the efficacy of novel therapeutics and characterize real world outcomes.

OCT outcomes as biomarkers for disease status, visual function, and prognosis in diabetic macular edema.

PURPOSE: To evaluate disorganization of retinal inner layers (DRIL), as detected on spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) images, as a biomarker for diabetic macular edema (DME) activity, visual function, and prognosis in eyes with DME. DESIGN: Longitudinal prospective. METHODS: Post hoc correlation analyses were performed on data from a phase 2 clinical trial. Seventy-one eyes of 71 patients with treatment-naive DME received either suprachoroidally administered CLS-TA (proprietary formulation of a triamcinolone acetonide injectable suspension) combined with intravitreal aflibercept or intravitreal aflibercept with a sham suprachoroidal injection procedure. DRIL area, maximum horizontal extent of DRIL, ellipsoid zone (EZ) integrity, and the presence and location of subretinal (SRF) and intraretinal fluid (IRF) were evaluated at baseline and week 24 by certified reading centre graders. RESULTS: At baseline, the area and maximum horizontal extent of DRIL were negatively correlated with best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA; r = -0.25, p = 0.05 and r = -0.32, p =0.01, respectively). Mean baseline BCVA progressively worsened with each ordinal drop in EZ integrity, improved with the presence of SRF, and was invariant to the presence of IRF. DRIL area and maximum extent were significantly decreased at week 24 (-3.0 mm2 [p < 0.001] and -775.8 mm [p < 0.001], respectively. At week 24, decreases in the area and maximum horizontal extent of DRIL were positively correlated with increases in BCVA (r = -0.40, p = 0.003 and r = -0.30, p = 0.04). Improvements in BCVA at week 24 were no different between patients showing improvement in EZ, SRF, or IRF and those showing no improvement or worsening from baseline. CONCLUSIONS: DRIL area and DRIL maximum horizontal extent were demonstrated to be novel biomarkers for macular edema status, visual function, and prognosis in eyes with treatment-naive DME.

Suprachoroidal CLS-TA with and without Systemic Corticosteroid and/or Steroid-Sparing Therapy: A Post-Hoc Analysis of the Phase 3 PEACHTREE Clinical Trial.

PURPOSE: To study the efficacy and safety of suprachoroidal CLS-TA (proprietary suspension of triamcinolone acetonide) in uveitic macular edema (UME) with and without concurrent systemic corticosteroid or steroid-sparing therapy (ST). METHODS: Post hoc analysis of the PEACHTREE phase 3 randomized trial. RESULTS: Among UME patients receiving no ST, at week 24, mean BCVA change was +15.6 letters in 68 CLS-TA patients versus +4.9 letters in 49 sham-control patients (p < .001), while mean CST change was -169.8 µm versus -10.3 µm, respectively (p < .001). Among patients receiving ST, at week 24, mean BCVA change was +9.4 letters in 28 CLS-TA patients versus -3.2 letters in 15 sham-control patients (p = .019), while mean CST change was -108.3 µm versus -43.5 µm, respectively (p = .190). No SAEs related to treatment were reported. CONCLUSIONS: A clinically meaningful benefit of CLS-TA was noted in UME patients, regardless of concurrent ST usage.Abbreviation and AcronymsCST = central subfield thickness; BCVA = best corrected visual acuity; ME = macular edemaI; IVT = intravitreal; AE = adverse event; FA = fluocinolone acetonide; SD-OCT = spectral-domain optical coherence tomography; NIU = noninfectious uveitis; SAE = serious adverse event; TEAE = treatment emergent adverse event; ITT = intent to treat; CI = confidence interval.

Triamcinolone Acetonide Suprachoroidal Injectable Suspension for Uveitic Macular Edema: Integrated Analysis of Two Phase 3 Studies.

INTRODUCTION: Macular edema, a common complication of uveitis, may result in vision loss. The aim of this analysis was to report integrated phase 3 trial data for triamcinolone acetonide injectable suspension for suprachoroidal use (SCS-TA) in the treatment of macular edema secondary to noninfectious uveitis using strict inclusion criteria. METHODS: This analysis included patients with central subfield thickness (CST) ≥ 300 µm and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of ≥ 5 and ≤ 70 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters at both screening and baseline who received ≥ 1 study treatment in either PEACHTREE (randomized, double-masked SCS-TA or sham control) or AZALEA (open-label SCS-TA). Patients received SCS-TA 4.0 mg (0.1 ml of 40 mg/ml) or control at baseline and week 12. RESULTS: In the SCS-TA group (n = 95), 47.4% of patients gained ≥ 15 ETDRS letters from baseline to week 24 versus 16.7% of patients in the control group (n = 60; P < 0.001). Mean change in BCVA in the SCS-TA group was 9.6 letters at week 4 and 13.9 letters at week 24. CST also improved rapidly in the SCS-TA group (mean change: - 158.4 µm at week 4), with sustained reduction throughout the study (mean change: - 163.9 µm at week 24 versus - 19.3 µm in the control group; P < 0.001). No treatment-related serious adverse events (AEs) were reported. Incidence of AEs pertaining to elevated intraocular pressure was 12.6% and 15.0% in the SCS-TA and control groups, respectively; incidence of cataract formation/worsening AEs was 7.4% and 6.7%, respectively. CONCLUSION: In this integrated analysis utilizing strict inclusion criteria, SCS-TA was found effective in the treatment of patients with macular edema associated with noninfectious uveitis and was generally well tolerated. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02595398, NCT03097315.

Advancements in ocular gene therapy delivery: vectors and subretinal, intravitreal, and suprachoroidal techniques.

INTRODUCTION: Ocular gene therapy represents fertile ground for rapid innovation, with ever-expanding therapeutic strategies, molecular targets, and indications. AREAS COVERED: Potential indications for ocular gene therapy have classically focused on inherited retinal disease (IRD) but more recently include acquired retinal diseases, such as neovascular age-related macular degeneration, geographic atrophy, and diabetic retinopathy. Ocular gene therapy strategies have proliferated recently, and include gene augmentation, gene inactivation, gene editing, RNA modulation, and gene-independent gene augmentation. Viral vector therapeutic constructs include adeno-associated virus and lentivirus and continue to evolve through directed evolution and rationale design. Ocular gene therapy administration techniques have expanded beyond pars plana vitrectomy with subretinal injection to intravitreal injection and suprachoroidal injection. EXPERT OPINION: The success of treatment for IRD, paired with the promise of clinical research in acquired retinal diseases and in administration techniques, has raised the possibility of in-office gene therapy for common retinal disorders within the next 5 to 10 years.

Suprachoroidal delivery enables targeting, localization and durability of small molecule suspensions.

Drug delivery to the suprachoroidal space (SCS®) has become a clinical reality after the 2021 FDA approval of CLS-TA, a triamcinolone acetonide injectable suspension for suprachoroidal use (XIPERE®), administered via a microneedle-based device, the SCS Microinjector®. Suprachoroidal (SC) delivery facilitates targeting, compartmentalization, and durability of small molecule suspensions, thereby potentially addressing some of the efficacy, safety, and treatment burden limitations of current retinal therapies. Herein, the design features of the SCS Microinjector are reviewed, along with the biomechanics of SC drug delivery. Also presented are preclinical evaluations of SC small molecule suspensions from 4 different therapeutic classes (plasma kallikrein inhibitor, receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, corticosteroid, complement factor D inhibitor), highlighting their potential for durability, targeted compartmentalization, and acceptable safety profiles following microinjector-based SC delivery. The clinical evaluations of the safety, tolerability and efficacy of SC delivered triamcinolone further supports potential of SC small molecule suspensions as a clinically viable strategy for the treatment of chorioretinal diseases. Also highlighted are current limitations, key pharmacological considerations, and future opportunities to optimize the SC microinjector platform for safe, effective, and potentially long-acting drug delivery for the treatment of chorioretinal disorders.

Anatomic Biomarkers of Macular Edema Associated with Retinal Vein Occlusion.

PURPOSE: To assess the relationship between best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and anatomic features in patients with macular edema (ME) related to retinal vein occlusion (RVO). DESIGN: Post hoc analysis of 3 clinical trials, which included verified diagnoses, protocol refractions, and the assessment of OCT and fluorescein angiography (FA) images at a masked reading center. PARTICIPANTS: Patients diagnosed with RVO-ME. METHODS: Correlation analyses were performed to determine the correlation between BCVA and macular anatomy at baseline and at 12 and 24 weeks and between changes from baseline to 12 and 24 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The correlations between BCVA and central subfield thickness (CST), ellipsoid zone (EZ) integrity, intraretinal fluid (IRF), subretinal fluid, central leakage, and ischemia were assessed. RESULTS: In a total of 828 eyes with RVO-ME, the mean age, BCVA, and CST at baseline was 64.7 years, 51.1 letters, and 656.9 µm, respectively. At baseline, a moderate negative correlation was observed between BCVA and CST (r = - 0.56, P < 0.001). At weeks 12 and 24, the mean BCVA of eyes with definitely abnormal (absent) EZ was statistically significantly worse than that of eyes with normal EZ. At week 12, a moderate negative correlation was observed between changes in BCVA and changes in CST (r = - 0.35, P < 0.001), with a similar degree of association noted at week 24 (r = - 0.35, P < 0.001). At weeks 12 and 24, eyes that showed any improvement in central IRF showed a greater improvement in BCVA than eyes that showed no improvement worsening (week 12: 463 eyes, 18.3 letters vs. 177 eyes, 13.0 letters, respectively, P < 0.001) and (week 24: 332 eyes, 20.2 letters vs. 131 eyes, 13.3 letters, respectively, P < 0.001). With respect to the correlation between baseline BCVA and fluorescein leakage or capillary nonperfusion, the Pearson correlation coefficients were - 0.41 (P < 0.001) and - 0.16 (P = 0.060), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to CST, there are important clinically relevant relationships between BCVA and both OCT and FA anatomic features in patients with RVO-ME.

Progress in the pharmacotherapy of uveitis: the art of personalized care.

INTRODUCTION: Uveitis is a heterogeneous group of inflammatory intraocular disorders that can lead to blindness, but prompt diagnosis and management can improve visual outcomes and reduce treatment burden. AREAS COVERED: In this review, the authors provide an overview of commonly used treatments for the management of noninfectious uveitis. EXPERT OPINION: Initially, the treatment of noninfectious uveitis was limited to corticosteroids, which have a broad range of adverse ocular and systemic effects. Now new delivery and therapeutic options, such as biological response modulators, represent novel yet exciting additions to this armory and have the potential to alter the course of treatment as well as prognostic outcomes for uveitis patients. Further research is needed to evaluate the efficacy of this novel class of immunomodulators in uveitis therapy.

Molecular Genetic Mechanisms in Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is among the leading causes of irreversible blindness worldwide. In addition to environmental risk factors, such as tobacco use and diet, genetic background has long been established as a major risk factor for the development of AMD. However, our ability to predict disease risk and personalize treatment remains limited by our nascent understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying AMD pathogenesis. Research into the molecular genetics of AMD over the past two decades has uncovered 52 independent gene variants and 34 independent loci that are implicated in the development of AMD, accounting for over half of the genetic risk. This research has helped delineate at least five major pathways that may be disrupted in the pathogenesis of AMD: the complement system, extracellular matrix remodeling, lipid metabolism, angiogenesis, and oxidative stress response. This review surveys our current understanding of each of these disease mechanisms, in turn, along with their associated pathogenic gene variants. Continued research into the molecular genetics of AMD holds great promise for the development of precision-targeted, personalized therapies that bring us closer to a cure for this debilitating disease.

Longer-Term Anti-VEGF Therapy Outcomes in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration, Diabetic Macular Edema, and Vein Occlusion-Related Macular Edema: Clinical Outcomes in 130 247 Eyes.

PURPOSE: The clinical practice visual acuity (VA) outcomes of anti-VEGF therapy for up to 5 years were assessed in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), diabetic macular edema (DME), branch retinal vein occlusion-related macular edema (BRVO-ME), and central retinal vein occlusion-related macular edema (CRVO-ME). DESIGN: A retrospective analysis was performed using the Vestrum Health Retina Database. PARTICIPANTS: Treatment-naive patients with nAMD, DME, BRVO-ME, or CRVO-ME who received anti-VEGF injections between 2014 and 2019 and had follow-up data for ≥12 months. METHODS: Data on age, sex, the number of anti-VEGF treatments, and VA were analyzed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mean VA change up to 3 years (BRVO-ME and CRVO-ME) and 5 years (nAMD and DME). RESULTS: At 1, 3, and 5 years, in 67 666, 21 305, and 5208 eyes with nAMD, after a mean of 7.6, 19.5, and 32 injections, there was a mean change of +3.1, -0.2, and -2.2 letters, respectively. At 1, 3, and 5 years, in 40 832, 7728, and 1192 eyes with DME, after a mean of 6.2, 15.4, and 26.0 injections, there was a mean change of +4.7, +3.3, and +3.1 letters, respectively. At 1 and 3 years, in 12 451 and 3027 eyes with BRVO-ME, after a mean of 7.1 and 18.2 injections, there was a mean change of +9.5 and +7.7 letters, respectively. At 1 and 3 years, in 9298 and 2264 eyes with CRVO-ME, after a mean of 7.3 and 18.8 injections, there was a mean change of +8.3 and +6.0 letters, respectively (P < 0.01 for all VA changes of > 1 letter). In all 4 conditions, the mean VA increased with the mean number of anti-VEGF injections, eyes with a baseline VA of 20/40 or better tended to lose VA, and eyes with progressively worse baseline VA experienced a progressively greater VA gain at 3 years. CONCLUSIONS: In practice, patients with nAMD, DME, BRVO-ME, and CRVO-ME showed limited visual outcomes, with patients with nAMD tending to lose VA at 3 and 5 years. Across all 4 disorders, the mean change in VA correlated with treatment intensity at 1, 3, and 5 years. Patients with better baseline VA are more vulnerable to vision loss.

A Randomized, Double-Masked, Multicenter Trial of Topical Acrizanib (LHA510), a Tyrosine Kinase VEGF-Receptor Inhibitor, in Treatment-Experienced Subjects With Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether topical acrizanib (LHA510), a small-molecule vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitor, could suppress the need for anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy over a 12-week period in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration. DESIGN: A phase 2 multicenter randomized double-masked, vehicle-controlled proof-of-concept study. METHODS: Trial includes n = 90 patients with active choroidal neovascularization due to neovascular age-related macular degeneration and under anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment. All patients received an intravitreal injection of ranibizumab at baseline and were retreated when there was evidence of disease recurrence (rescue). Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive topical LHA510 or vehicle for 12 weeks. Drops were administered twice a day for 8 weeks and then 3 times a day for the last 4 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The primary outcome was the number of patients requiring rescue over 84 days of topical dosing. Key secondary outcome measures were time to first rescue, total number of ranibizumab injections, changes in central subfield thickness, and changes of visual acuity from baseline to day 84. RESULTS: The extended per protocol set included 70 patients of whom 25 of 33 patients in the LHA510 group (75.8%) and 25 of 37 patients in the placebo group (67.6%) required rescue by day 84 (P = .8466). Secondary and subgroup analysis did not support evidence of efficacy. Twenty-one of 46 patients administered LHA510 developed a reversible corneal haze that resolved with cessation of treatment and did not recur in patients restarted at once daily frequency. CONCLUSION: In spite of extensive optimization for topical efficacy, LHA510 failed to demonstrate clinical efficacy.

Sustained release glaucoma therapies: Novel modalities for overcoming key treatment barriers associated with topical medications.

Glaucoma is a progressive optic neuropathy and a leading cause of irreversible blindness. The disease has conventionally been characterized by an elevated intraocular pressure (IOP); however, recent research has built the consensus that glaucoma is not only dependent on IOP but rather represents a multifactorial optic neuropathy. Although many risk factors have been identified ranging from demographics to co-morbidities to ocular structural predispositions, IOP is currently the only modifiable risk factor, most often treated by topical IOP-lowering medications. However, topical hypotensive regimens are prone to non-adherence and are largely inefficient, leading to disease progression in spite of treatment. As a result, several companies are developing sustained release (SR) drug delivery systems as alternatives to topical delivery to potentially overcome these barriers. Currently, Bimatoprost SR (DurystaTM) from Allergan plc is the only FDA-approved SR therapy for POAG. Other SR therapies under investigation include: bimatoprost ocular ring (Allergan) (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01915940), iDose® (Glaukos Corporation) (NCT03519386), ENV515 (Envisia Therapeutics) (NCT02371746), OTX-TP (Ocular Therapeutix) (NCT02914509), OTX-TIC (Ocular Therapeutix) (NCT04060144), and latanoprost free acid SR (PolyActiva) (NCT04060758). Additionally, a wide variety of technologies for SR therapeutics are under investigation including ocular surface drug delivery systems such as contact lenses and nanotechnology. While challenges remain for SR drug delivery technology in POAG management, this technology may shift treatment paradigms and dramatically improve outcomes.

Disease progression pathways of wet AMD: opportunities for new target discovery.

INTRODUCTION: Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the leading cause of irreversible blindness among people age 60 years or older in developed countries. Current standard-of-care anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy, which inhibits angiogenesis and vascular permeability, has been shown to stabilize choroidal neovascularization and increase visual acuity in neovascular AMD. However, therapeutic limitations of anti-VEGF therapy include limited durability with consequent need for frequent intravitreal injections, and a ceiling of efficacy. Current strategies under investigation include targeting VEGF-C and VEGF-D, integrins, tyrosine kinase receptors, and the Tie2/angiopoietin-2 pathway. A literature search was conducted through November 30, 2021 on PubMed, Medline, Google Scholar, and associated digital platforms with the following keywords: wet macular degeneration, age-related macular degeneration, therapy, VEGF-A, VEGF-C, VEGF-D, integrins, Tie2/Ang2, and tyrosine kinase inhibitors. AREAS COVERED: The authors provide a comprehensive review of AMD disease pathways and mechanisms involved in wet AMD as well as novel targets for future therapies. EXPERT OPINION: With novel targets and advancements in drug delivery, there is potential to address treatment burden and to improve outcomes for patients afflicted with neovascular AMD.

Optical Coherence Tomography Anatomic and Temporal Biomarkers in Uveitic Macular Edema.

PURPOSE: To assess the relationship between best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) features in noninfectious uveitis (NIU)-related macular edema. DESIGN: Clinical cohort study from post hoc analysis of 2 phase 3 clinical trials. METHODS: Correlation and longitudinal treatment analyses were performed. Of 198 patients with NIU, 134 received suprachoroidal CLS-TA (proprietary formulation of a triamcinolone acetonide injectable suspension), and 64 received sham, with 12.9% and 72%, respectively, receiving rescue therapy. RESULTS: At baseline, mean BCVA progressively worsened with each ordinal drop in central subfield ellipsoid zone (EZ) integrity. Eyes with normal baseline EZ experienced greater 24-week change in BCVA versus those with some degree of baseline EZ disruption (11.9 vs 9.4 letters, P = .006). In contrast, eyes with baseline central subfield cystoid spaces and/or subretinal fluid showed more improvement (13.7 or 17.2 letters, respectively) at 24 weeks, versus those without such findings (5.5 [P = .012] or 9.5 letters [P < .001], respectively). Longitudinal modeling for CLS-TA-treated eyes showed that central subfield thickness (CST) reached 90% of maximal improvement by week 3, whereas 90% maximal response in BCVA was not reached until week 9. CLS-TA-treated eyes that showed CST reduction of ≥50 µm at 4 weeks experienced a greater 24-week improvement in BCVA versus those without such an early response (14.6 vs 6.5 letters, P = .006 for difference). CONCLUSIONS: Pretreatment EZ integrity and the presence of central subfield cystoid spaces or subretinal fluid each predict improved therapeutic response to treatment in eyes with NIU. In CLS-TA treated eyes, longitudinal modeling shows CST improvement preceding BCVA improvement.

Suprachoroidal triamcinolone acetonide versus rescue therapies for the treatment of uveitic macular oedema: A post hoc analysis of PEACHTREE.

BACKGROUND: This post hoc analysis compared the efficacy and safety of suprachoroidally administered triamcinolone acetonide (CLS-TA) to other commonly available treatments for non-infectious uveitis. METHODS: Results from the PEACHTREE study were compared between subjects randomised to CLS-TA not requiring rescue therapy and those subjects randomised to control, who subsequently required rescue therapy. Endpoints included best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central subfield thickness (CST), treatment emergent adverse events and intraocular pressure (IOP) related safety findings. RESULTS: In this analysis, there were 83 unrescued CLS-TA subjects and 46 rescued control subjects. At Week 24, 51.9% of the unrescued CLS-TA subjects gained ≥15 letters in BCVA, compared to 37.0% of the rescued control subjects (p = 0.115). Unrescued CLS-TA subjects showed a mean gain of 15.7 versus 10.9 letters in rescued control subjects (p = 0.080). A significantly greater mean reduction in CST was observed for unrescued CLS-TA subjects versus rescued control subjects (174.0 and 148.5 µm; p = 0.040). Of unrescued CLS-TA subjects, 4.9% experienced IOP elevations ≥30 mm Hg at any visit versus 10.9% of rescued control subjects. Further, use of IOP-lowering medications appeared lower in unrescued CLS-TA subjects versus rescued control subjects (7.2% vs. 13.0%). There were no IOP-lowering surgical interventions in either group. CONCLUSION: CLS-TA subjects experienced significantly greater reduction in CST and tended towards greater improvement in BCVA, compared with rescued control subjects. Suprachoroidally administered CLS-TA showed a lower incidence of IOP-related safety findings.

Challenges of Cost-Effectiveness Analyses of Novel Therapeutics for Inherited Retinal Diseases.

PURPOSE: To investigate the challenges and potential improvement strategies of cost-effectiveness analyses performed for therapeutics targeting inherited retinal diseases (IRDs). DESIGN: Perspective. METHODS: A literature review was conducted with discussion of current limitations and improvement recommendations. RESULTS: Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) performed for IRD therapeutics has multiple limitations. First, the available methods used to measure health-related quality of life and health utilities can be inaccurate when used in IRDs. Second, the financial burden to patients and society from vision impairment associated with IRDs has been inadequately studied and includes a variety of expenditures ranging from direct costs of IRD specialty health care to indirect expenses associated with daily living activities. Third, our collective understanding is limited in the areas of IRD natural history and health benefits gained from new IRD treatments (eg, gene therapies). In addition, the therapeutic effect from a patient perspective and its duration of action are not fully understood. Due to the scarcity of data, CEA for newly approved therapies has relied on assumptions and creations of predictive models for both costs and health benefits for these new therapeutics in order to calculate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. CONCLUSIONS: CEA studies performed for IRD therapeutics have been limited by the established health utilities in ophthalmology and the lack of disease-specific information. The assumptions and extrapolations in these studies create substantial uncertainty in incremental cost-effectiveness ratio results. An improved framework is required for CEA of IRD therapeutics in order to determine the cost-effectiveness of each therapy brought from clinical trials to clinical practice.